dc.description.abstract |
There is a rich experience in literary studies in terms of researching the
relationship between “one’s own” and "belonging to someone else". This
issue has been known since ancient times and quite frequently attracts the
attention of researchers. Literary imitation, borrowing, plagiarism, etc., often
appear as objects of research. Among the most attractive categories is a
reminiscence, many theoretical or practical-literary aspects of which still
need further exploration and analysis.
The remarkable representatives of the Tartu school and other prominent
scholars of the twentieth century, Z. Minc, R. Timenchik, P. Torop, I.
Levin, T. Segal and others through their research have demonstrated the role,
function, and significance of reminiscences and quotations as essential
elements of a fictional text in terms of the perception and understanding of
the authorial intentions. The findings and position of these researchers are
logically linked to M. Bakhtin’s theory, according to which culture is a
phenomenon of dialogue, while dialogue is a universal category of culture.
Literary texts exist insofar as they are involved in a dialogue or a polylogue
with other texts.
The study of different aspects of reminiscence and dialogue is not
foreign to Georgian literary criticism either. Reminiscence, as well as various
issues related to it, have been studied by different generations of researchers.
In this respect works of M. Miresashvili, N. Gaprindashvili, T. Sidamonidze,
M. Kvirkvelia etc. are especially significant.
Reminiscence is a productive artistic method that involves two types of
memory. On the one hand, it is connected with the mental ability of a reader
to encode, store and restore any information and artistic-aesthetic memory,
through which the author redirects the recipient of the work of art to the
cultural-historical facts, events, literary works of predecessors or contemporaries,
on the other. The nature, role and function of these literary-cultural
or historical-social parallels are also significant. It is a peculiar form of
dialogue that the author conducts with the reader in the hope that the reader
will also become acquainted with the ancient culture and will perceive and
understand their thoughts.
There was a different understanding of reminiscence in different eras.
However, writers and representatives of other fields of arts often employed reminiscence, intentionally or unintentionally, to refer to another writer,
musician, artist, etc. as well as any artistic element of the work, passage,
title, or motifs. This way, they try to convey and express their ideologicalaesthetic
position and message to the reader, listener, viewer. They achieve
this mainly by reflecting retrospectiveness of consciousness, allusions,
quotations, restoration-repetition of an existing work of art, artistic phrase
or construction on the same or a similar subject.
Reminiscence occupies a significant place in Georgian literature; it is a
highly interesting and productive artistic method. It gives the reader the
aesthetic pleasure of meeting once experienced, already read and thus
familiar again, and has the ability to infinitely expand not only the creative
palette of the author but also the semantic frames of the text and the horizon
of the reader. When creating reminiscence, the author hopes to connect with
the literary memory and associative perception of the reader with high
intellect, sophisticated artistic-aesthetic experience and culture. Through
literary reminiscence, writers give new life to the artistic works of their
predecessors or contemporaries and create a new literary reality through
dialogue. Moreover, literary reminiscence has a philosophical and aestheticutilitarian
function. It combines the historical experience of cultures, literary
texts written either in a different or in the same period, resulting in the
hypertext of literature.
We can say that, on the one hand, reminiscence, can be seen as a "test",
a challenge to the reader set by the writer, and a peculiar aesthetic game, on
the other. The author is interested whether the reader is capable of guessing
and recognising the artistic images, characters, story layers, thus, at first
glance, an "unknown", but at the same time, the new "building material"
embedded in the work. Unlike the original text, it is read in a new way and
performs a different function in the new artistic reality. The nature of
reminiscence in each particular case depends on its artistic and aesthetic
functions and purpose in the literary text.
This article discusses the practical models of reminiscence on the
example of “The Martyrdom of the Holy Queen Shushanik” by Iakob Khutsesi
and the poetry of Ana Kalandadze. |
en_US |