DSpace Repository

შუამდინარული რიტუალის ხორბლის უხვი მოსავლის მიღების ინტერპრეტაციისთვის

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author სამსონია, ნინო
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-29T08:35:26Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-29T08:35:26Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation აკადემიკოს კონსტანტინე წერეთლის დაბადებიდან მე-100 წლისთავისადმი მიძღვნილი საერთაშორისო კონფერენცია, თეზისები, 2021, გვ.: 219-224/ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE DEDICATED TO THE CENTENARY OF THE BIRTH OF ACADEMICIAN KONSTANTINE TSERETELI, ABSTRACTS, p.: 219-224 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.tsu.ge/xmlui/handle/123456789/979
dc.description.abstract In the article, before discussing the irrigation ritual performed by Enmerkar, the king of the first dynasty of Uruk (from the Sumerian epic “Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta), we address the knowledge and tradition of water management in Mesopotamia. The laying of the canal, the completion and management of the irrigation system was traditionally in the hands of the supreme ruler, the king. We consider the inscription of King Larsa, Rim-sin I (1758-1699 BC) on how he dug a royal canal. We read in Rim-sin’s text that he, like Enmerkar, performs an irrigation ritual, although the text tells us nothing about the description of the ritual. In the Enmerkar text, the irrigation ritual is presented in detail, although it remains obscure due to the metaphorical language of the text. The texts discussed in the article are from the later period of Enmerkar - Lagash, Ur III dynasty and the kings of Larsa City are centuries away from the reign of Enmerkar, while city-state Uruk and the kings of its first dynasty must have possessed the secret of laying and managing the canal, as evidenced by the abundance of wheat of Uruk, which was handed down to posterity, by putting it on the board. We will discuss verses 308-329 of the text of the Sumerian epic, Enmerkar and Lord of Aratta on an unknown irrigation ritual, where the king performs the most difficult task. Enmerkar should demonstrate the immense potential of Uruk for growing wheat, which is related to the perfect management of the irrigation system. The ritual performed by Enmerkar, like that Rin-sin I of Larsa, must be associated with the brilliant management of the irrigation system. The king manages to water (moisten) a fairly large amount of wheat. At the beginning of the ritual, the king interconnected the Tigris to the Euphrates, to indicate the possibility of managing a large amount of water. The king appears as the supreme ruler of the canal, thus fulfilling the function of a priest. However, due to the metaphorical language of this ritual, it remains unclear how Enmerkar achieves the goal. If we follow the mythological aspect of the text, we will see the knowledge that the deity Nisaba shared only with his chosen ones. Based on the texts discussed, it can be assumed that Enmerkar used the water of the “reservoir” of canals - ikum, the Sumerian equivalent of which is recorded in the epics of the kings of Uruk. Akkadian ikum corresponds to Sumerian eg, which means a dam, and as mentioned above, many scholars translate it as a channel. This word is first recorded in the epic of Enmerkar, the heir to Lugalbanda, with the same meaning. That is, Enmerkar opened the water from the canal ikum, which, as we have seen above, was a 60/60 length-width construction of the same Sumerian texts - eg, he was able to water the harvest for the whole year, then the text tells us that the wheat sprouts grew, he filled the nets with wheat and sent to the Lord of Aratta. In this way he was able to complete the most difficult task. Enmerkar made the Lord of Aratta see the wealth and superiority of Uruk. The term encountered in the texts - nag-ku (d) is of interest. It is considered to be the construction of an elongated basin. The first syllable of the word is nag — Sumerian verb, which means “to drink”, is associated with drinking water and quenching thirst. Is it possible that the semantics of the word may allow us to assume that the words of verse 310 of the Enmerkar ritual, “The king interconnected Euphrates and Tigris” means the launching of this reservoir, the management of which Enmerkar must have been well versed in. Relying upon the texts discussed in the article, let us summarize the irrigation terms recorded in cuneiform texts of III-II millennium BC: 1. ikum (Akk.) (Sum. Eg) = 60/60 meter construction between dams and canals; 2. nag-ku (d) (Akk.) - construction of an elongated basin near the canals (90 meters long and 2 metres deep), reservoir; 3. gugallum - canal Supervisor. Two unfamiliar terms remain in the Enmerkar ritual text: eš- da — sacred bowl, a vessel meaning of which is unknown, and lidga — measurement, presumably of land. One thing is clear - both words are related to irrigation activities, and maybe to the drainage system as well, which existed in the Mesopotamian city-states, however, the cuneiform texts keep silence regarding the description of the drainage system and, consequently, the method of its usage. Presumably eš- da and lidga were the sacral tools of the king. According to the text, the king himself placed golden eš-da between the vessels and attached lidga to the land, the use of which probably remained a secret with the king. en_US
dc.language.iso ge en_US
dc.publisher უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა en_US
dc.subject შუმერული en_US
dc.subject ირიგაცია en_US
dc.subject სარწყავი არხი en_US
dc.subject ენმერქარი en_US
dc.subject შუამდინარეთი en_US
dc.subject წყალდიდობა en_US
dc.subject მიწათმოქმედება en_US
dc.subject Sumerian en_US
dc.subject Irrigation en_US
dc.subject Canal en_US
dc.subject Enmerkar en_US
dc.subject Mesopotamia en_US
dc.subject Flood en_US
dc.subject Agriculture en_US
dc.title შუამდინარული რიტუალის ხორბლის უხვი მოსავლის მიღების ინტერპრეტაციისთვის en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace

Advanced Search


My Account