Abstract:
US Civil War is one of the most important and interesting sections of contemporary
history of the USA. This later event caused a big resonance. The purpose of
the presentation is based on the Georgian periodical press to show the attitude of
the XIX century Georgian advanced society towards US Civil War, their position
and sympathies toward south and north states. In addition, our task is, through the
consistent narrative of the facts, to show US Civil War in Georgian periodicals and
find out: 1) what was the purpose of coverage of one of the most important events of
the world history; 2) what was the main thing and massage for readers; 3) did it have
any positive impact on the development of Georgian society or not, or it was just a
propaganda and popularization in terms of learning civil war?
This issue hasn’t been studied in the narrow scientific field so far, and we tried
to pay attention to this. In general, the importance of press in that period was high,
because it was one of the major information sources. Everything began from the
60th of the XIX century, when Georgian periodical journals and magazines emerged.
Such a timely response wasn’t casual and was caused due to the high topicality and
importance of this event. In fact, these were the first serious symptoms regarding
popularization and interest in contemporary history of the USA.
The newspaper “Droeba” was one of the major actors of the Georgian civil opinion
in the second half of the 19th century. The Newspaper was issued in 1866-1885
years. The contemporary history and, in this case, the war was actively covered by the
newspaper “Droeba”. From these publication letters, it was clearly shown that they
were deeply familiar with the life of people living in the USA and the state processes
about which they published letters systematically.
First of all, the attention shall be paid to the importance of these publicist materials.
What value does it have? Shall we adopt it or not? How logically is the major
meaning expressed? i.e. these points are essential to focus correctly while discussing
the issue. Surely, the correctly chosen criteria have an essential importance and will
help us to create adequate image and it is the main thing. It is important to logically
evaluate this heritage, not to take it to extremes. It should be carried out neither very
apologetically nor with a complete disregard. Both these extremes are unacceptable. For that time it was a step forward and the information provided had, has and will
always have its own place in Georgian historiography. The meaning of this “Black
Job” is determined by its cognitive importance. As we can see, this interest wasn’t
superficial and only narrated dry facts. They maximally tried to draw attention on
target-effective connection and exactly this was the main dignity of their reasoning.