Abstract:
An important role in ensuring the well-being of the population is how the
society has mastered the defining (basic) reasons for its economic activities
- its own relations and the motivation of the activities caused by them - and
how it uses them to achieve the desired result. The coexistence and ratio of two
forms of property, private property and public property, has historically always
conditioned the essence of the socio-economic order, the result of economic
activity. At the same time, private property, the substance that determines
motivation, has always been dominant. Therefore, understanding the motivation
of private owners, the correct theoretical assessment of the pros and cons
of this motivation and the impact on the well-being of their society and its
practical application should become one of the main means of developing highyield
production in our country. In our reality, the solution to this problem is
complicated by the fact that private property was restored in the country not
through the acquisition of wealth, but through the privatization of public property
by individuals using various illegal, criminal methods of ownership of the entire
population. Added to this was the seizure of wealth by private owners by the
criminal “elite” imprisoned in state structures in 2002-2012. It is clear that such
a nature of the process would not have contributed to the stimulation of the
motivation of private property relations, weakening its downside. This indicates
that the Georgian government must grasp the importance and severity of the
problem, consistently and simultaneously pursue a comprehensive policy of
maximizing the pros and cons of the relationship between private owners.
Description:
• Basaria V., Basaria R. (2017). „ekonomikis printsipebi“. sakartvelos akademiuri gamomtsemloba.
[“Principles of Economics”. Georgian Academic Publishing House,
Tbilisi pp.362).] In Georgian.
• ekonomikuri leksikoni (2011). propesor a. silagadzis redaktorobit. tsu-is gamomtsemloba,
tbilisi. [Economic Dictionary. (2011). Under the leadership of Prof.
A. Silagadze. TSU Publishing House, Tbilisi.] In Georgian.
• tsagolovi g. (2016). „meshvide pormatsia“. interviu „ekonomika da biznesi“ N1,
[Tsagolov G. (2016). “The Seventh Formation.” Interview. “Economy and Business”
N1.pp.151-158.] In Georgian.
• Biznes. Tolkovyy slovar. (1998) Angl. - russk. - M .: INFRA. [Business. Explanatory
dictionary. English - Russian - M .: INFRA pp. 760.] In Russian.
• Macconnell, Campbell R., Bru, Stanley L. (1992). Economics - Principles, Problems
and Politics in 2 vol. V II. – “Republic” pp.400.
• Macmillan (1997). Glossariy sovremennykh ekonomicheskikh teoriy. [Dictionary
Modern Economic Theory. - M .: INFRA – M, pp.608.] In Russian.
• Tabakov S. (1997). Evolyutsiya otnosheniy sobstvennosti. «Ekonomist» №2. [
Evolution of Property Relations. M. “The Economist” N2.] In Russian.
