Abstract:
The paper discusses business and social environment trends on the example
of Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, which revealed that the quality of life, the
level of human development and various economic indicators partly determine
the business and social environment in the countries of the South Caucasus. The
topic is relevant, as the assessment of the impact of the business and social
environment will reflect not only the image of a single country, but also the South
Caucasus region, which can further become the basis for deepening integration
into world processes.
In research innovative multi-criteria analysis methods developed for stakeholders
will help to properly select a partner country with different priorities
in mind. The study includes 10 years of data using multi-criteria analysis (MCDM)
methods, as the best means of discussing social and economic problems. Initially,
the most important criteria were identified by investors, on which we partially
used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method, and then the Comprehensive
Proportionality Assessment (COPRAS) method. The paper identified useful and
unhelpful criteria for the stakeholder in a particular country.
The paper identifie ,,Beneficial’’ and ,,Non-Beneficial’’ criteria for the stakeholder
in a particular country and also outlined the list of positive and negative
alternatives that each country needs to improve.
The research showed that Georgia is almost always the leader in international
rankings, followed by Armenia and then Azerbaijan, however, it should be noted
that the situation with regard to economic indicators is changing. The reason for
this is often considered natural resources.
Finally, the Complex Proportional Assessment of alternatives (COPRAS)
method presented Azerbaijan as a leading country in assessing the business
and social environment in the region, taking into account various criteria, then
followed by Georgia and Armenia with a 71,21% and 42,32% Utility Degree.
Description:
შენგელია თ. (2008). ბიზნესის ადმინისტრირების საფუძვლები, თბილისი
გვ. 25-28
საქართველოს ახალგაზრდა ეკონომისტთა ასოციაცია, (2008), პროექტი
“ბიზნეს-გარემოს გაუმჯობესება საქართველოში”. თბილისი
Chládková H. (2015). Selected Approaches to the Business Environment Evaluation.
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 63. pp. 515-
523.
Gerald H. (2011). Foreign Direct Investment in Azerbaijan –the Quality of Quantity,
Caucasus Analytical Digest. No 28. pp. 3.
Kaklauskas A., Zavadskas E.K., Trinkunas V. (2007). A Multiple Criteria Decision Support
on-line System for Construction, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.
Vol. 20(2), pp. 163-75.
Kaklauskas A., Zavadskas E.K., Binkyte A.V., Kuzminske A., Cerkauskas J., Cerkauskiene
A., Valaitiene R. (2020). Multiple Criteria Evaluation of the EU Country
Sustainable Construction Industry Lifecycles. pp. 1-10.
Kaklauskas E., K., Kaklauskas A., Sarka V. (1994). The New Method of Multicriteria
Complex Proportional Assessment po Projects. Technological and Economic Development
of Economy 1 (3), pp.131-139.
Saaty T.L. (2008). The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Measurement Processes:
Applications to Decisions under Risk, European Journal of Pure and Applied
Mathematics, Vol.1(1) pp. 122-196.
UNCTAD, World Investment Report, (2002).Transnational Corporations and Export
Competitiveness, United Nations, New Yourk and Geneva. pp. 291.
Vetráková M., Potkány M., Hitka, M. (2013). Outsourcing of Facility Management.
E&M Economics and Management, Vol. 16, No.1, pp. 80-92.
Zak S. (2012). International Marketing: Theory, Practices and New Trends, Prague
Economic Papers, 2. pp. 251-254.
https://study.com/academy/lesson/how-the-social-environment-affects-business.
html /ბოლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
Report 2014: Environmental, Social and Governance: Integration for Banks: A Guide
to Starting Implementation. http://wwf.panda.org/?226990 / ბოლო ნახვა 08
ნოემბერი, 2020/
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG?locations=AM-AZ-GE/
ბო ლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=AM-AZ-GE,
ბოლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=AZ-AM-GE/
ბო ლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=AZ-AM-GE,/
ბოლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
https://www.armstat.am/en/?nid=176 /ბოლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
https://www.stat.gov.az/source/trade/?lang=en. /ბოლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი,
2020/
https://www.geostat.ge/ka/modules/categories/35/sagareo-vachroba/ბოლო
ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/rankings /ბოლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
http://hdr.undp.org/en/data /ბოლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
https://www.socialprogress.org/?tab=3&compare=ARM&compare=AZE&compare=
GEO /ბოლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
https://imperiumapps.com/the-effects-of-social-environment-on-business /ბო-
ლო ნახვა 08 ნოემბერი, 2020/
References:
Shengelia T. (2008). biznesis administrirebis sapudzvlebi [Fundamentals of Business
Administration. Tbilisi. pp.25-28.] in Georgian.
sakartvelos akhalgazrda ekonomistta asotsiatsia (2008). proekti “biznes-garemos
gaumjobeseba sakartveloshi”. tbilisi [Georgian Young Economists Association
(2008), project “Improving the Business Environment in Georgia”. Tbilisi.] in Georgian.
Chládková H. (2015). Selected Approaches to the Business Environment Evaluation.
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. 63. pp. 515-
523.
Gerald H. (2011). Foreign Direct Investment in Azerbaijan –the Quality of Quantity,
Caucasus Analytical Digest. No 28. pp. 3.
Kaklauskas A., Zavadskas E.K., and Trinkunas V. (2007). A Multiple Criteria Decision
Support on-line System for Construction, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.
Vol. 20(2), pp. 163-75.
Kaklauskas A., Zavadskas E.K., Binkyte A.V., Kuzminske A., Cerkauskas J., Cerkauskiene
A., Valaitiene R. (2020). Multiple Criteria Evaluation of the EU Country
Sustainable Construction Industry Lifecycles. pp. 1-10.
Kaklauskas E., K., Kaklauskas A., Sarka V. (1994). The New Method of Multicriteria Complex Proportional Assessment po Projects. Technological and Economic Development
of Economy 1 (3), pp.131-139.
Saaty T.L. (2008). The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Measurement Processes:
Applications to Decisions under Risk, European Journal of Pure and Applied
Mathematics, Vol.1(1) pp. 122-196.
UNCTAD, World Investment Report, (2002).Transnational Corporations and Export
Competitiveness, United Nations, New Yourk and Geneva. pp. 291.
Vetráková M., Potkány M., Hitka, M. (2013). Outsourcing of Facility Management.
E&M Economics and Management, Vol. 16, No.1, pp. 80-92.
Zak S., (2012). International Marketing: Theory, Practices and New Trends, Prague
Economic Papers, 2. pp.251-254.
https://study.com/academy/lesson/how-the-social-environment-affects-business.
html last seen 08 /11.2020/
Report 2014: Environmental, Social and Governance: Integration for Banks: A Guide
to Starting Implementation. http://wwf.panda.org/?226990 /last seen 08 /11.2020/
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG?locations=AM-AZ-GE/
last seen 08 /11.2020/
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=AM-AZ-GE/last
seen 08 /11.2020/
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=AZ-AM-GE /last
seen 08 /11.2020/
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.CD.WD?locations=AZ-AM-GE,/last
seen 08 /11.2020/
https://www.armstat.am/en/?nid=176 last seen 08 /11.2020/
https://www.stat.gov.az/source/trade/?lang=en. last seen 08 /11.2020/
/last seen 08 /11.2020/
https://www.doingbusiness.org/en/rankings / last seen 08 /11.2020/
http://hdr.undp.org/en/data /last seen 08 /11.2020/
https://www.socialprogress.org/?tab=3&compare=ARM&compare=AZE&compare=
GEO /last seen 08 /11.2020/
https://imperiumapps.com/the-effects-of-social-environment-on-business /last
seen 08 /11.2020/