Abstract:
In the context of trade liberalization, governments have changed protectionist
tools, and in many cases, they protect domestic industries with the
variations of non-tariff barriers. Georgia has signed bilateral or multilateral
trade agreements with many countries around the world, which aim to stimulate
trade flows. However, despite the occurrence of the free trade regimes that
relieve trade from the burden of tariffs, the effect of non-tariff barriers is in
some cases full-scale. In the present article, against the background of these
non-tariff barriers, an attempt is made to assess the effectiveness of stimulating
Georgia’s international trade flows using the following well-known indices in
the economic literature: Trade Openness Index, Geographical and Sectoral Trade
Composition Indices, Export Diversification Level Index, Export Growth Margin,
and Sectoral Comparative Advantage Index.
In the present paper I conducted a detailed analysis about Georgia’s current
international trade flows. In particular, the structural characteristics and trade
indices are estimated based on the export and import statistics for September
2020.
In international trade, indices help us to show the results of the country’s
trade activities. The trade results include: 1) Georgia’s trade flows’ quantity
statistics, 2) What are trading commodities, and 3) who are Georgia’s trading
partners. The analysis of all three components is important, since each of them
generates effects that have an impact on the domestic economy.
The country’s trade volume is closely linked to trade openness, which
measures the ability of the economy to integrate into world trade flows and in
the global value chains. Trade openness can also be understood as an indicator
of the “achievement” of trade policy.
As for the second topic, about trading commodities, it defines the structure
of the imports and exports, connected to productive factors and the technologies
available in the economy. Also, it is directly related to the diversification of the
Georgia’s exports and the country’s comparative advantage.
The third topic - who are Georgia’s trading partners - reveals the fact of how
profitable the country’s position is. For example, the existence of trade lines
with growing and technologically strong markets will lead to the increase in the
productivity of the economy. Geographical and territorial distances between
countries are important here.
In the article we will see that free trade regimes have a positive impact
on Georgia’s international trade flows, which is reflected in Georgia’s trade
openness index. Georgia has many trading partners, including EU developed
countries, to which it trades in similar industries, which is a positive indicator
of sectoral convergence with these developed economies. We will also see that
Georgian economy has a low level of export diversification. However, locally, the
export growth margins of the economy are normal.
Description:
(WTO) W. T. (2011). World Trade Report 2011: Preferential Trade Agreements. Geneva:
WTO.
Balassa B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage. The
Manchester School 33, 99–123.
Brander J. A. (1983). A “Reciprocal Dumping” Model of International Trade. Journal
of International Economics 15(3–4), 313–321.
Brülhart M. (1994). Marginal Intra-Industry Trade: Measurement and Relevance for
the Pattern of Industrial Adjustment . Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 130, 600–613.
Cadot O. C.-K. (2011). Export Diversification: What’s Behind the Hump? Review of
Economics and Statistics 93(2), 590–605.
Grubel H. G. (1975). Intra-Industry Trade: The Theory and Measurement of International
Trade in Differentiated Products. New York: Wiley.
Krugman P. (1979). Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International
Trade. Journal of International Economics 9(4), 469–79.
Leamer E. (1988). “Measures of Openness”, in Trade Policy Issues and Empirical
Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 145–204.
Nicita A. a. (2006). “Trade, Production and Protection 1976–2004”. World Bank Economic
Review 21(1), 165–171.
Organization W. T. (თ. გ.). A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis.
Melitauri N. (2020). sakartvelo-evrokavshirs shoris vachrobis liberalizatsiis shedegebi.
[EU-Georgia Trade Liberalization Effects. Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State
University and Paata Gugushvili Institute of Economics International Scientific
Conference Publication.] (in Georgian)
Gaganidze G. (2017). kartuli produktsiis saeksporto potentsiali da konkurentuli upiratesobebi
evrokavshiris bazarze. [Export Potential and Competitive Advantages
of the Georgian Products on the EU Market.Economics and Business.] (in Georgian)
Jamagidze L. (2019.) institutebis importi sakartvelo-evrokavshiris savachro urtiertobebis
speroshi. [Institution Importation in Georgia-EU Trade Relations. Economics
and Business.] (in Georgian)