Privatization and post-communist economic transformation (critical analysis of the experiences of Central, Eastern Europe and the Baltic States) (პრივატიზაცია და პოსტკომუნისტური ეკონომიკური ტრანსფორმაცია (ცენტრალური, აღმოსავლეთ ევროპის და ბალტიის ქვეყნების გამოცდილების კრიტიკული ანალიზი))

Abstract
Privatization is a dividing line between the administrative-command system and the market economy. After the collapse of the Soviet bloc, the process of post-communist transformation began in Central, Eastern European countries and the former “Union Republics”, the content and main direction of which was determined by the privatization of state property. In the post-communist transition period, privatization was characterized by both -general and specific signs. Based on the research, two groups of countries were identified. Some post-communist countries (Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic) and post-soviet country (Estonia) have successfully privatized and achieved high positive results: increased the efficiency of privatized enterprises, improved corporate governance, modernized technology, attracted foreign technology and Know-How, has been created a highly competitive environment, fiscal discipline has been raised, and so on. In countries where privatization has been flawed, the desired results have not been achieved. On the contrary, privatization has become a serious source of severe economic crisis and deepening social tensions. Due to the phenomenon of privatization, one of the “mysterys “ of the postcommunist transition period can be explained: countries that were in an almost equal starting position at the initial stage of systemic transformation, are today significantly different in terms of economic development and living standards. The main reason for such differentiation is the different effectiveness of privatization in these countries.
Description
• Balcerowicz L. (2002). saxelmcipo gardamaval periodshi [State in Transition Period. Tb]. (in Georgian). • Basilia T., Silagadze A., Chikvaidze T. (2001). Post-socialuri transformacia: saqartvelos ekonomika XXI saukunis mijnaze [Post-socialist Transformation: Georgian Economy at the Turn of the XXI Century]. (in Georgan). • Brada Joseph C. (1996). “Privatization is Transition – or is It?”. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10 (2): 67-86. • EBRD, Transition Report, 1995. • Frydman Roman, Andrzej Rapaczynski (1994). Privatization in Eastern Europe: Is the State Withering Away. Budapest: Central European University Press. • Glinski Dimitri, and Redway Peter. 1999. “The Ravage of Market Bolshevizm”. Jounal of Democracy 10 (2): 19-34. • Kaufman Daniel, and Paul Siegelbaum. (1999). “Privatization and Corruption in Transition Economies. Journal of International Affairs 50 (2): 419-458. • Kornai J. (1990). The Road to a Free Economy. Shifting from Socialist System: The Example of Hungary. NY: Norton. • Lipton David, and Jeffrey D. Sachs (1990). “Privatization in Eastern Europe: The Case of Poland”. Brookings Papers of Economic Activity 20 (2): 293-341. • Murrell Petter and Yijiang Wang (1993). “When Privatization should be Delayed: The Effect of Communist Legacies on Organizational and Institutional Reforms”. Journal of Comparative Economics. 17(2): 385-406. • Papava V. (2005). Necroeconomics. The Political Economy of Post-communist Capitalism. iUniverse, Inc. New York, Lincoln, Shanghai. • Papava V. (2015). Saqartvelos ekonomika, reformebi da psevdoreforebi, Tb. “Inteleqti” [Georgian Economy, Reforms and Pseudo-Reforms. Tb., “Intellect”]. (in Georgian). • Papava V. (2020). Aratradiciuli ekonomiksi. [Unconventional Economics. Tbilisi State University and P. Gugushvili Publishing House of the Institute of Economics]. (in Georgian). • Papava V. (2010). Nekroekonomikis zombireba [Zombie Necroeconomics]. (in Georgian). • Roland G. (1994). On the Speed and Sequencing of Privatization and Restructuring”. Economic journal 104: 1158-1168. • Roland G. (2000). “Corporate Governance Systems and Restructuring. Lessons from the Transition Experience; Washington D. C. World Bank Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, April, 18-20. • Roland Gerard (1993). “Political Economy of Restructuring and Privatization in Eastern Europe”, European Economic Review 37 (2-3): 533-540. • Shleifer A., and Treisman D. 2000) Without a Map: Political Tactics and Economic Reform in Russia. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Keywords
Post-communist systemic transformation, privatization, voucher, stock market, restitution, restructuring
Citation
Economics and Business, №1, 2021, pp. 115-130
Collections