პოლიფუნქციური ი- ქართული ზმნის უღლებაში (გვარის კატეგორიისათვის)/ Polyfunctional i- in Georgian Verb Conjugation (For category of voice)

dc.contributor.authorბარამიძე/ Baramidze, ცირა/ Tsira
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-21T06:37:40Z
dc.date.available2022-11-21T06:37:40Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-12
dc.description.abstractThe paper deals with the functions of the i-prefix in the Georgian verb and the morphosyntactic function of this marker in the verb conjugation system. I consider any verb morphological category of the Georgian language in the context of morphosyntax, where each morpheme (element) is much larger than the morpheme; A morphosyntactic key element (morpheme) is not just a word (lexical unit), nor words or morphemes, but is a form-content combination. In the traditional sense, syntax is the coordination, structure, and sequence of lexical items. In fact, Georgian morphology and syntax are intertwined; A morphosyntactic approach to the morpheme (in this case, imorpheme) allows us to define the syntactic structure ("trees") of this morpheme, which is paired with phonological and conceptual information: Accordingly, it creates a distinct system-structure (ი-წერ-ებ-ა ის i-tsereba is; ვ-ი-წერ მე მას v-i-tser me mas; მ-ი-წერ-ს ის მას მე m-i-tsers is mas me); Discussing morphosyntax through a prism allows us to study a polyfunctional verb as a morphological category (dynamics-statics, person, version, causative, transitive, voice, reflexive, introvert ...) "Size" with different lexical units and also stores information about a different, second syntactic construction in the case of form identity (e.g., future - ი-ცხოვრებ-ს ის icxovrebs is < > present იცხოვრებს ის მას icxovrebs is mas). As lexical units, they are presented separately in the dictionary; The syntactic "connection" with the actants associated with these units is non-identical. The morpheme (i-) is much larger than the morpheme - it bears a system of different sizes: 1. lexical unit (იბოლებს ibolebs), 2. construction (იბოლებს ის მას ibolebs is mas, იბოლებს ის ibolebs is), 3. defines several morphological and modal categories. The morpheme stores information about the creation of these categories in the history of the Georgian language. The paper discusses the morpheme i- in the context of the voice category. I express the opinion that in Georgian (as well as in other Kartvelian languages) the separation of the category of voice is artificial.en_US
dc.identifier.citationქართული ენის დღისადმი მიძღვნილი სამეცნიერო კონფერენცია, პროგრამა და თეზისები, თბილისი, 12 აპრილი 2022, გვ.: 19-22en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tsu.ge/handle/123456789/1955
dc.language.isogeen_US
dc.publisherუნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობაen_US
dc.subjectქართული ზმნაen_US
dc.subjectი- მორფემაen_US
dc.subjectპოლიფუნქციურობაen_US
dc.subjectნანომორფოსინტაქსიen_US
dc.subjectGeorgian verben_US
dc.subjecti- morphemeen_US
dc.subjectpolyfunctionalityen_US
dc.subjectnanomorphosyntaxen_US
dc.titleპოლიფუნქციური ი- ქართული ზმნის უღლებაში (გვარის კატეგორიისათვის)/ Polyfunctional i- in Georgian Verb Conjugation (For category of voice)en_US
dc.title.alternativePolyfunctional i- in Georgian Verb Conjugation (For category of voice)en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
14 აპრილი - 2022 ენის დღისადმი მიძღვნილი კონფერენცია_03.pdf
Size:
61.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: