Issues of optimizing the use of state budget funds in Georgia
Loading...
Date
2024
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Press
Abstract
Effective management of the state budget is an important factor of the country's
financial stabilization and correct forecasting, its basis is the introduction of modern
management principles of the budget system, the formation of an institutional and
legal base corresponding to European standards. The article discusses the role of the
budget system in the unified process of managing the economy of Georgia and
certain features of its functioning, the issues of optimization of vertical budget
segmentation and proper coordination.
On the basis of the Law on Budgetary Systems, government reserve funds have
been created within the state budget of Georgia since 2005 to cover unforeseen
expenses. The operation of this fund is one of the important issues of the state
budget, as, along with the fiscal burden, the Reserve Fund plays a significant role in
financial support for the main priorities of the state’s social policy.
Despite the compliance of the budget system of Georgia with the European
standards, the issue of reserve funds still involves a certain problem. The issues of
structuring and targeting of reserve funds, its legal and institutional provision
require special attention. The problems of formation and effective management of
reserve funds are discussed in the presented report.
The foundation for the formation of Georgia’s modern budget system was
placed by the public financial management reform (2004), which was based on the
principles of the Open Government Partnership (OGP) and on the international
standards of GFSM-2001. The compliance of the legal norms of the budget system of
Georgia with European standards was ensured by the Organic Law “On Economic
Freedom” (2011). An important legal basis for the effective administration of the
budget structure and public finance management was created by the government
decree - “Public Administration Reform” (2019).
The legal basis for the process of harmonizing the functions of budgets at
individual levels in Georgia is made up by the following regulations: Organic laws
“On Local Self-Government and Management” (1997) and “On Local Self-Government”
(2007), Laws “On the Budget of Local Self-Government Units” (2006), “On local
government bodies “On Property” (2006) and others.
According to the budget transparency, which was published in 2021, Georgia
was on the first place from 120 countries in the whole world [20]. According to the
future forecasts, this success will be further consolidated by the implementation of
85% of the legislative obligations provided for the agreement on a deep and
comprehensive free trade zone with the European Union in 2024, in addition to it, all the obligations in the field of public procurement will be fully implemented, as well,
as on customs and technical barriers to trade.
In accordance with the IMF, the fiscal system of Georgia today is normal and its
indicators do not exceed the threshold level of sustainability. The international
standards of fiscal security are also observed, while it has identified a number of
problems, which are necessary to be considered for the stability of the financial
sector and the effective functioning of fiscal mechanisms for regulating the
economy. Here is the list of the following problems, such as:
Long-term provision of financial stability
Effective use of reserve funds
Financial management of state-owned enterprises.
The IMF has given priority for assessing long-term factors of fiscal sustainability,
which are reflected in the international regulatory document - “Multi-year
Indicative Program - MTP” (2020). This document about the delegation of powers
between government and fiscal institutions, provides the formation of the optimal
economic ties, which is only possible while using the conditions of an effective policy
of decentralization of public administration.
The reserve fund of the Georgian government is subordinate to the executive
branch and its volume. According to the state budget for 2024, is set at 80 million
laris (an increase of 33.4%). The fund's expense structure contains:
Unforeseen expenses – 28%
Carrying out events of national importance – 26%
Uninterrupted functioning of budgetary organizations – 13%
Social expenses - 7%
Electoral process services – 3%
Financing of European integration events and political parties -2% and
others.
According to the Georgian legislation, money from the government's reserve is
only allocated to finance expenses. But, not provided for the budget, so, in our days ,
there is a high risk of inefficient use of funds and instability caused by multiple
changes in the distribution of the reserve’s fund, which prevents propering the
budget planning and effective control of its execution.
The process of managing reserve funds of the state budget, is especially
problematic. Similar as to justify the intended purpose of expenses; therefore , it is
necessary to develop a unified standard, which helps us to control the fund funds
instead of unforeseen expenses . In addition to it, it is only recommend to use it in a
force majeure situation and finances such an emergency expenses that could not be
predicted in advance, this will significantly increase the responsibility of spending
organizations for taking into account all the expected expenses when drawing up the
budget, which will eliminate the bad practice of requesting additional funds from the
reserve fund during the year. Also, in emergency situations, it will be allowed to
finance from the reserve fund such unplanned expenses when leaving them without financial support from the state could cause irreparable damage to the country’s
international reputation or its propert.
The issue of targeting transfers transferred from the reserve fund to local
government also requires legal revision, since in some cases, they do not correspond
to the purpose of the targeted, capital or special transfers which are existing today.
To summarize, strictly formulated targeting system will help departments to plan the
budget correctly and determine the exact size of the reserve fund itself, which is an
important condition for the sustainability of Georgia’s budget system.
Description
Kukava M. (2016). Sarezervo pondebidan kharjva kvlav seriozul problemad rcheba,
[Spending from Reserve Funds Remains a Serious Problem Transparency. International
Foundation- Georgia, Tbilisi.] in Georgian
Papava I. (2019). Detsentralizatsiis kartuli paradoksi: tsentralizatsia detsentralizatsiis
sakhelit. [Georgian Paradox of Decentralisation: Centralisation Instead of
Decentralisation.] in Georgian https://droa.ge/?p=41594.
Tabatadze M. (2017). sakhelmtsipo martvis detsentralizatsiis institutsiuri segmentirebis
teoriuli sakitkhebi [Theoretical Issues of Institutional Segmentation of State
Management Decentralization.] TSU, II International Scientific Conference, Tbilisi.] in
Georgian https://opac.sciencelib.ge/bib/179808
Tabatadze M. (2020). sivrtsiti ekonomikis prioritetebi da detsentralizatsiis piskaluri
mekanizmebi [Priorities of Spatial Economy and Fiscal Mechanism of
Decentralisation. Journal of International Economic Research, vol. 6(1), p. 13-22, ISSN
2500-9737.] in Georgian https://irissymposium.wixsite.com/jier
Tabatadze M. (2022). pinansuri stabilizatsiis sakhelmtsipo antikrizisuli strategia
[State Anti-crisis Strategy for Financial Stabilization. Collection of Materials of the
International Scientific Conference of the Institute of Economics Named after Paata
Gugushvili TSU, pp. 330-338. Tbilisi.] in Georgian.
http://conferenceconomics.tsu.ge/uploads/images/konfkreb2022.pdf\
IDFE (2019). adgilobrivi tvitmmartvelobis sarezervo pondebis kharjva 2020 tsels,
[Expenditure of local Self-Government Reserve Funds in 2020. LUMUNATE, Tbilisi.] in Georgian. https://idfi.ge/ge/expenditures of contingency funds of local municipalities
in 2020
International Budget Partnership, IBP (2021).
OECD (2019). Making Decentralization Work, a Handbook for Policy-Makers.
Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/regional/making-decentralisation-work-g2g-
9faa7-en.htm
International Monetary Fund (2022). piskaluri detsentralizatsia. [Fiscal Decentralization].
in Georgian. https://data.imf.org/?sk=1c28ebfb-62b3-4b0c-aed3-
048eeebb684f.
Government of Georgia (2019). dadgenileba „Sajaro mmartvelobis repormis 2019-
2020 tslebis samokmedo gegmis damtkitsebis shesakheb“, [Resolution "On
Approval of the 2019-2020 Public Administration Reform Action Plan".] in Georgian.
Government of Georgia (2023). dadgenileba “Sajaro mmartvelobis repormis 2023-
2026 tlebis strategiisa da sajaro mmartvelobis repormis 2023-2024 tslebis
samokmedo gegmis damtitsebis shesakheb” [Resolution on "Approving the Public
Administration Reform Strategy for 2023-2026 and the Public Administration Reform
Action Plan for 2023-2024".] in Georgian.
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2022). „sakhelmtsipo biujetis kanoni,- mokalakis
gzamkvlevi“ ["State Budget Law,- Citizen's Guide"] in Georgian. https://www.-
mof.ge/images/File/gzamkvlevi/2022/30-12-2021/Citizens% 20Guide%20-%202022-
kanoni.pdf
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2023). “sakhelmtsipo biujetis kanoni, Mokalakis
gzamkvlevi” ["State Budget Law, - Citizen's Guide.] in Georgian. https://www.mof.-
ge/5677
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2023). prezidentis sarezervo pondi [President's
Reserve Fund.] in Georgian. https://president.gov.ge/, https://www.matsne.gov.
ge/ka/document/view/5723982?publication=0
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2017). „sajaro pinansuri martvis reporma
saqartveloshi“ ["Public Finance Management Reform in Georgia". The European
Union for Georgia, pp. 8.] in Georgian. https://bit.ly/3wKcWi9
Ministry of Finance of Georgia (2018). sakartvelos kanoni „sakhelmtsipo biujetis
shesakheb“,- Ganmartebiti barati. [Law of Georgia "On the State Budget”,-
Explanatory Card.] in Georgian.
https://www.mof.ge/5677
https://parliament.ge
http://sa.gov.ge
https://mof.ge/5177
www.geostat.ge
All electronic sources were last viewed on February 15, 2024
Keywords
Citation
Economics and Business, 2024, №1, 168-184