გიორგი V ბრწყინვალის ქართული ტიტულატურისათვის
| creativework.keywords | ქართველი მეფეები, გიორგი ბრწყინვალე, ტიტულები | |
| dc.contributor.author | ბახტაძე, მიხეილ / Bakhtadze, Mikheil | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-12T05:32:44Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-12T05:32:44Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.description | https://geohistory.humanities.tsu.ge/ge/procedings/83-shromebi/178-shromebi-19.html | |
| dc.description.abstract | We have very little information about Giorgi the Brilliant, and what we have, they do not record the full Georgian title of the king. In the document of Giorgi V that has reached us, unfortunately, the full title of the king is not written. Only the last phrase of the title is recorded. If we take into account the titles of the kings of the united Georgia, it is clear that the beginning of the titles would be – “By the will of God, the king of the Abkhazians, Kartvelians, Ranians, Kakhetian and Armenians, Sharvansha and Shahansha.” Another point to be considered is that from the end of the 14th century another formulation appears in the title of the Bagrations – the owner of Likht-Imer and Likht-Amer and the unifier of both kingdoms. For the first time such a title is confirmed in the 1393 charter of Giorgi VII. Then similar formula can be found already in the charters of 1413, 1419, 1420 and 1441 of Alexander I. The question arises, when should the formula – owner of Likht-Imer and Likht-Amer appear? Only after the unity of the divided kingdom was restored, and it happened during the reign of Giorgi the Brilliant. Theoretically, the title – “owner of Likht-Imer and Likht-Amer” could be accepted for the first time by: Giorgi V the Brilliant, David IX, Bagrat V or even Giorgi VII. Why was it necessary to introduce this title? The traditional titulature no longer reflected reality (for several centuries there were no more Abkhazian, Kartvelian, Ranian and Kakhetian kingdoms) and to some extent reflected “frozen reality”. They needed a title that reflected the reality of that era and would be understandable to everyone. “Owener Licht-Imer and Licht-Amer” was a formula, which reflected this situation. In our opinion, the full Georgian title of Giorgi the Brilliant could have been – the king of Abkhazians, Kartvelians, Ranians, Kakhetians and Armenians, Sharvansha and Shahansha, the unifier of Likht-Imer and Likht-Amer, the ruler of all the East and West. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი, საქართველოს ისტორიის ინსტიტუტის შრომები, XIX, თბილისი, 2023, გვ. 59-66 / Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Institute of Georgian History Proceedings, XIX, Tbilisi, 2023, pp. 59-66 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1987–9970 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://dspace.tsu.ge/handle/123456789/2438 | |
| dc.language.iso | other | |
| dc.publisher | ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა | |
| dc.title | გიორგი V ბრწყინვალის ქართული ტიტულატურისათვის | |
| dc.title.alternative | ABOUT THE GEORGIAN TITULATURE OF GIORGI V THE BRILLIANT | |
| dc.type | Article |