Analysis of the competitiveness of the export of industrial goods (production) of Georgia (საქართველოს სამრეწველო საქონლის (ნაწარმი) ექსპორტის კონკურენტუნარიანობის ანალიზი)

Abstract
Since regaining its independence, Georgia has been following the principles of liberal policy and is striving to expand the area of foreign trade relations. In this aspect, it is crucial to identify the sectors of the economy that have the potential to gain international competitiveness. In addition, researchers often point to the importance of the development of high value-added, technology-intensive industries for the development of the country's economic well-being. The paper provides the ranking of the industrial commodity groups of Georgia according to their competitiveness. The list of the industrial goods (production) is classified according to the RCA index and technological parameters. In particular, products based on natural resources, low, medium and high technologies are grouped based on technological capabilities, while the commodity positions being under threat, developing and weakly positioned are grouped according to their competitiveness.
Description
1. Abidin, M.Z. and Loke, W.H. (2008), “Revealed comparative advantage of Malaysian exports: the case of changing export composition”, Asian Economic Papers, Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 130-147. 2. Acharya, R.C. (2008), “Analysing international trade patterns: comparative advantage for the world’s major economies”, Journal of Comparative International Management,Vol.11No.2, pp. 33-53. 3. Balassa, B. (1965), “Trade liberalisation and revealed comparative advantage”, The Manchester School, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 99-123 4. Balassa, B. and Noland, M. (1989), “Revealed’ comparative advantage in Japan and the United States”, Journal of International Economic Integration, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 8-22. 5. Bems, R. and Johnson, R.C. (2012), “Value-added exchange rates”, National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER WP No. 18498. 6. Bender, S. and Li, K.W. (2002), “The changing trade and revealed comparative advantages of Asian and Latin American manufacture exports”, Economic Growth Center, Yale University, Discussion Paper No. 843. 7. Crafts, N. F. (1989). Revealed comparative advantage in manufacturing, 1899-1950. Journal of European Economic History, 18(1), 127. 8. Fetscherin, M., Alon, I., Johnson, J.P. and Pillania, R.K. (2012), “Competitiveness: review, reflections and directions”, Global Business Review, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 188-206. 9. Gaganidze G. Growth of Export:The Need To Create New Export Products. Globalization & Business, 7, 2019; 24-32; 10. Gaganidze, G; Arefeev, Igor; Munjishvili, Tea. (2021)The development of a systematic and analytical model for foreign trade forecasting. DSpace Repository. https://dspace.tsu.ge/handle/123456789/831. 11. Haberler, G. (1936), The Theory of International Trade, William Hodge, Edinburgh. 12. Heckscher, E. (1919), “The effect of foreign trade on the distribution of income”, Ekonomisk Tidskrift, pp. 497-512. 13. Huo, D. (2014), “Impact of country-level factors on export competitiveness of agriculture industry from emerging markets”, Competitiveness Review, Vol. 24 No. 5, pp. 393-413. 14. Hye, Q.M.A. (2012), “Long-term effect of trade openness on economic growth in case of Pakistan”, 15. Kathuria, L.M. (2013), “Analyzing competitiveness of clothing export sector of India and 16. Lee, J. (1995), “Comparative advantage in manufacturing as a determinant of industrialization: the korean case”, World Development, Vol. 23 No. 7, pp. 1195-1214. 17. Lee, Y. S. (1986). Changing export patterns in Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 122(1), 150-163. 18. Mahmood, A., & Nishat, M. (2004). Export Competitiveness and Comparative Advantage of Pakistan's Non-agricultural Production Sectors: Trends and Analysis [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 541-561. 19. Munjishvili T, Gaganidze G. Development of the specific gravitational model describing foreign trade between two countries with simulation method. Atlantic press. https://www.atlantispress. com/proceedings/smtesm-19/125917618 20. Ohlin, B. (1952), Interregional and International Trade: Revised Edition, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Quality and Quantity, Vol. 46 No. 4, pp. 1137-1149. 21. Peterson, J. (1988). Export shares and revealed comparative advantage. A study of international travel. Applied Economics, 20(3), 351-365. 22. Ray, D. (2000). How Competitive is Indonesia in the Emerging Global Knowledge Economy. Preparing for, 286-298. 23. Reza, S. (1983). Revealed comparative advantage in the South Asian manufacturing sector: some estimates. Indian Economic Journal, 31(2), 96-106. 24. Richardson, J. D., & Zhang, C. (2001). Revealing comparative advantage: chaotic or coherent patterns across time and sector and US trading partner?. In Topics in Empirical International Economics: A Festschrift in Honor of Robert E. Lipsey (pp. 195-232). University of Chicago Press. 25. Salvatore, D. (2013), International Economics, 11th ed., John Wiley & Sons, USA. Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 131-157.
Keywords
Manufactured goods, export, competitiveness, comparative advantage
Citation
VII International Scientific Conference: "Challenges of Globalization in Economics and Business", Tbilisi, 2022, pp. 391-408
Collections