სამართლიანობის პრობლემა როგორც თანამედროვე ფილოსოფიის გამოწვევა (ისტორიულ-კრიტიკული ანალიზი)
Loading...
Date
2024-02-14
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა
Abstract
The history of philosophical thought clearly shows that the issue of
justice belongs to the number of so-called eternal problems, which,
along with other similar problems, has given impetus to the movement
of thought in this field (i.e. philosophy) since the time of the origin of
philosophy. Eternal problems in philosophy, in turn, always imply eternal
approaches to them, which, in one form or another and with different
modifications, inevitably appear throughout the whole history of philosophy
in the form of a kind of dichotomous pairs. For the problem of justice,
the dichotomy of formal and historical-genetic approaches is central.
The formation of the mentioned dichotomy was given a certain
impetus by “David Hume’s guillotine” (“Hume’s principle”), which distinguishes
and separates morality and reality (moral order and real order).
However, the philosopher who took the decisive step in this direction
was I. Kant. He distinguished autonomous morality and heteronomous
morality, categorical imperative and hypothetical imperative, and showed
the superiority of the formal approach in the philosophy of morality
and law. He made obvious the fact that any different approach from it
(that is empirical ones) inevitably comes to the relativization of morality
(normative order).
In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries alternative theories of justice,
based on the criticism of the Kantian formalism, appeared in political
philosophy, which all without exception shared empirical (i.e. nonformal)
character. However, even in such a situation, the Kantian line did
not disappear in the studies of the problem of justice. We will focus on the fact that we fully share the Kantian view that a
non-formal approach to the problem of Justice in ethics, and political
and legal philosophy ultimately inevitably leads to relativism. This result
of a non-formal approach implies in itself fundamental contradictions
and thus, it is a theoretical challenge to the study of justice that must be
overcome. Therefore, in our opinion, the philosophical understanding of
justice should be carried out simultaneously of putting forward the formal
principle as the base of the whole construction, i.e. it is necessary to
judge in the field of the qualitative difference of philosophical figure
between value and fact, normative and real. However, at the same time,
the approach mentioned above should be synthetic, that is, it should explain
and establish the cognitive connection between the formal-axiomatic
base and (even the most general) real principles.
Description
Keywords
Citation
თბილისის უნივერსიტეტის დაარსებისადმი მიძღვნილი სამეცნიერო კონფერენცია. თსუ 106, თეზისები, 2024, გვ.: 100-103 / Scientific conference dedicated to the foundation of Tbilisi University. TSU 106, Abstracts, 2024, pp.: 100-103