Social entrepreneurship as a new field of research

dc.contributor.authorJanelidze, Nino
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-13T11:16:09Z
dc.date.available2021-04-13T11:16:09Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.description Alter K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. – Virtue Ventures LLC. P. 124.  Austin J. E. (2009). Corporate social entrepreneurship / Austin. J. E. & Ezequiel Refi cco. (2009). Cambridge, MA : Harvard Business School, (Working paper / Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration ; 09-101). – P. 8.  Bornstein D. (1998) Changing the world on a shoestring: an ambitious foundation promotes social change by fi nding ‘social entrepreneurs’ // The Atlantic Monthly. – Vol. 281, Issue 1. – P. 34-39.  Boschee J. (1995). Social Entrepreneurship // Across the Board – Vol. 32, Issue 3. – p. 20-25.  Boschee J. (2001). Eight basic principles for nonprofi t entrepreneurs // Nonprofi t World. – July-August. – P. 15-18.  Deese J. G. (1998). Enterprising nonprofi ts // Harvard Business Review. – Vol. 76, Issue 1. – P. 55-66.  Dees J. G. & Anderson B. B. (2003). // International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. – Vol. 2. – P. 1-26.  Deese J. G. Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: building on two schools of practice and thought (2006) / J. G. Dees & B. B. Anderson // ARNOVA Occasional Paper Series. (2006). – Vol. 1, Issue 3. – P. 1- 28. 79.  Defourny J. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: recent trends and developments / Derourny J. & Nyssens. M. (2008). // Social Enterprise Journal. – Vol. 4, Issue 3. – P. 202-228.  Grayson D. (2004). Corporate social opportunity: 7 steps to make corporate social responsibility work for your business / Grayson. D & Hodges. A. (2004). Sheffi eld: Greenleaf. – P. 390.  Halme M. (2009). Philanthropy, integration or innovation? : exploring the fi nancial and societal outcomes of diff erent types of corporate responsibility / Halme. M. & Laurila. J. (2009). // Journal of Business Ethics. – Vol. 84, Issue 3. – P. 325-339.  Johnson S. (2000). Literature review on social entrepreneurship. P. 16. – (working paper / Canadian center for social entrepreneurship).  Lasprogata G. A. & Cotton M. N. (2003). Contemplating enterprise: the business and legal challenges of social entrepreneurship // American Business Law Journal. – Vol. 41. – P. 67- 113.  Mair J. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction, and delight / Mair. J. & Marti. I. (2006). // Journal of World Business. – Vol. 41, Issue 1. – P. 6-44.  Nicholls A. (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: refl exive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic fi eld / Nicholls A. (2010) // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. – Vol. 34, Issue 4. – P. 611-633.  Sagawa S. (2000). Common interest, common good : creating value through business and social sector partnership / Sagawa S. & Segal. E. (2000) // California Management Review. – Vol. 42, Issue 2. – P. 105-122.  Thompson J. (2002). The World of the social entrepreneur // International Journal of Public Sector Management. – Vol.15, Issue 5. – P. 412-431.  Thompson J., Alvy. G., & Lee. A. (2000). Management Decision. – Vol. 38, Issue 5. – P. 328-338.  Wallace S.L. (1999). Social Entrepreneurship: the role of social purpose entreprises in facilitating community economic development // Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship – Vol. 4. – P. 153-174.  Waddock S. A. (1988). Building successful social partnership // Sloan Management Review. – P. 17-23.  https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1501555  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4885554_Social_Entrepreneurship_Key_ Issuesand_Concepts  http://www.socialent.org/pdfs/MergingMission.pdfen_US
dc.description.abstractThe scientific conceptualization of social entrepreneurship began to form only in the 1990s. Some practical experience and theoretical materials on social entrepreneurship have already been accumulated in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. In last years the rapid growth of publications on social entrepreneurship in leading international peer-reviewed journals demonstrates the growing interest for researching this field. However, social entrepreneurship, as well as areas of new research, cannot be shaped by insufficient legitimacy and theoretical boundaries and indefinite content. The need to develop social entrepreneurship theory, which is at the stage of formation, is an important task for the development of social entrepreneurship itself. Social entrepreneurship, as a socio-economic and organizational event, has become the focus of researchers, business representatives and the state in recent years. Social entrepreneurship is a form of economic activity aimed at solving the problems of a defined group of people who do not have access to vitally essential prosperity due to failed state programs or market failures. Social entrepreneurship is not a new phenomenon, but it has made unprecedented growth worldwide lately, including in Georgia. This is due to the fact that on the one hand there is an exacerbation of the whole complex of social problems, and on the other hand, the inability of society to solve these problems through traditional methods of market economy and state support. The article deals with identifying the conceptual aspects of social entrepreneurship, defining social entrepreneurship as a new field of research, its place and role in the socioeconomic system, and analyzing its formation and development features to gain a deeper understanding of the essence of social entrepreneurship. The development of research in the field of social entrepreneurship has shifted the focus of attention from the essential issues of the formation and functioning of this event to the operational and strategic issues of the formation of organizations involved in social entrepreneurship. Gradually, studies have emerged in which the study of social entrepreneurship, the subject of analysis, and the unit of research is considered the business model and the peculiarities of the formation of business models of social entrepreneurship are discussed. In order to increase the effectiveness of the functioning of the organization implementing social entrepreneurship and defined in its development theory conceptual clarity both in practical and theoretical terms requires understanding of the basic business models of social entrepreneurship and the institutional features of their formation. The article identifies the fundamental elements needed to build the concept of social entrepreneurship, discusses the key features of the author’s definition of social entrepreneurship, identifies the main motivations and sources for the formation of social entrepreneurship.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEconomics and Business, №4, 2019, pp. 176-188en_US
dc.identifier.issn1987-5789
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tsu.ge/handle/123456789/657
dc.language.isogeen_US
dc.publisherIvane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Pressen_US
dc.subjectSocial entrepreneurship, social enterprise, the conceptual aspects of social entrepreneurshipen_US
dc.titleSocial entrepreneurship as a new field of researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Social Entrepreneurship as a New Field of Research.pdf
Size:
390.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections