ზნეობრივი სტანდარტები და სატელევიზიო მედიის რეგულირების პრიორიტეტები ამერიკის შეერთებულ შტატებსა და საქართველოში

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2021
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა
Abstract
Article attempts to compare legal approach and practice of TV media regulation in the United States and Georgia. Analysis of decisions of U.S. Supreme Court and Georgian Constitutional Court concerning community standards for broadcast indecency and regulatory measures shows diff erences in balance of media freedom and public interest protection. Georgian media advocacy groups state that in Georgia very high standard of free speech has been set, which equals the American standard, therefore discussing European standards are not relevant and best practices of European co-regulation are neglected. Meanwhile, increase in amount fi nes for breaches in cases of indecency, introduction of broadcasting blocking mechanisms and time-delay systems indicate high importance of public interest and protecting community moral standards in United States TV media regulation. Analysis shows that in the legal framework of Georgia priority is given to universalistic principles, public morality as legitimate aim is seen as a threat to media freedom. Changes in regulatory measures aimed at procuring media freedom indicate extrime shift towards the exclusion of state involvement and implementation of full self-regulation.
Description
Keywords
სატელევიზიო მედია, სტანდარტები, აშშ, საქართველო, TV media, standards, USA, Georgia
Citation
ამერიკის შესწავლის საკითხები, VIII, 2021, გვ.: 355-362 / Journal of American Studies, VIII, 2021, p.: 355-362
Collections