ლიტერატურის ფუნქციისათვის: სოლიდარობა და ომის ნარატივი ომისა და ანტიომის ლიტერატურაში

dc.contributor.authorპოპიაშვილი/ Popiashvili, ნინო/ Nino
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-07T11:22:05Z
dc.date.available2022-07-07T11:22:05Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-27
dc.descriptionივანე ჯავახიშვილის დაბადებიდან 146-ე წლისთავისადმი მიძღვნილი სამეცნიერო კონფერენციაen_US
dc.description.abstractOn the one hand, literature, as a field that carries the aesthetic function of art, is sustained and unchanged, a universal phenomenon that includes “artistic access”, and on the other hand, literature, as a reflection accompanying processes, changes as much as the society, values, points of view change. Accordingly, the literature reflects both change and innovation. This approach has become particularly topical in the literary studies of the “New Historicism”, where a cultural system participates in the creation of a literary text, which creates the basic motive of the text, substantive trends, direction and development. War, as a heroic description of heroic deeds, traces its roots back to ancient literature. The term includes military-themed texts inspired by war, although military literature also marks out such writings where military actions are not described but the experience of war is shown. The term Military Literature, which appeared during the First World War, was further deepened and expanded during the Second World War. Anti-war literature is a term developed after military literature and in its discourse, where civil heroism, solidarity, the human side of war, tragedy have taken the lead. Anti-war, the same anti-military literature singles out human rights, personal and social tragedies, where neither side is the winner. On the one hand, literature, as a field that carries the aesthetic function of art, is sustained and unchanged, a universal phenomenon that includes “artistic access”, and on the other hand, literature, as a reflection accompanying processes, changes as much as the society, values, points of view change. Accordingly, the literature reflects both change and innovation. This approach has become particularly topical in the literary studies of the “New Historicism”, where a cultural system participates in the creation of a literary text, which creates the basic motive of the text, substantive trends, direction and development. War, as a heroic description of heroic deeds, traces its roots back to ancient literature. The term includes military-themed texts inspired by war, although military literature also marks out such writings where military actions are not described but the experience of war is shown. The term Military Literature, which appeared during the First World War, was further deepened and expanded during the Second World War. Anti-war literature is a term developed after military literature and in its discourse, where civil heroism, solidarity, the human side of war, tragedy have taken the lead. Anti-war, the same anti-military literature singles out human rights, personal and social tragedies, where neither side is the winner. On the one hand, literature, as a field that carries the aesthetic function of art, is sustained and unchanged, a universal phenomenon that includes “artistic access”, and on the other hand, literature, as a reflection accompanying processes, changes as much as the society, values, points of view change. Accordingly, the literature reflects both change and innovation. This approach has become particularly topical in the literary studies of the “New Historicism”, where a cultural system participates in the creation of a literary text, which creates the basic motive of the text, substantive trends, direction and development. War, as a heroic description of heroic deeds, traces its roots back to ancient literature. The term includes military-themed texts inspired by war, although military literature also marks out such writings where military actions are not described but the experience of war is shown. The term Military Literature, which appeared during the First World War, was further deepened and expanded during the Second World War. Anti-war literature is a term developed after military literature and in its discourse, where civil heroism, solidarity, the human side of war, tragedy have taken the lead. Anti-war, the same anti-military literature singles out human rights, personal and social tragedies, where neither side is the winner. In the report, we will discuss the functional load of literature in military and anti-war literature. We will pay special attention to the discourses of solidarity and the experience of war on the example of contemporary Georgian literature.en_US
dc.identifier.citationივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის ჰუმანიტარულ მეცნიერებათა ფაკულტეტი, ჰუმანიტარულ მეცნიერებათა აქტუალური პრობლემები, თეზისები, თბილისი, 2022, გვ.: 101-104en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tsu.ge/handle/123456789/1759
dc.language.isogeen_US
dc.subjectლიტერატურის ფუნქციურობაen_US
dc.subjectომის ლიტერატურაen_US
dc.subjectანტიომის ლიტერატურაen_US
dc.subjectfunctionality of literatureen_US
dc.subjectmilitary literatureen_US
dc.subjectanti-war literatureen_US
dc.titleლიტერატურის ფუნქციისათვის: სოლიდარობა და ომის ნარატივი ომისა და ანტიომის ლიტერატურაშიen_US
dc.title.alternativeFOR THE FUNCTION OF LITERATURE: SOLIDARITY AND WAR NARRATIVE IN MILITARY AND ANTI-WAR LITERATUREen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
პოპიაშვილი-ივანე ჯავახიშვილი _ 146 (2)-101-104 (1).pdf
Size:
101.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Collections