Determining characteristics of competitiveness of agro-food products in the conditions of globalization (აგროსასურსათო პროდუქტების კონკურენტუნარიანობის განმსაზღვრელი მახასიათებლები გლობალიზაციის პირობებში)
Loading...
Date
2022
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University Press
Abstract
This paper discusses the determinants of product competitiveness and the Doctor of Economics views of
researchers in this area. The author draws conclusions about what can be the key to the competitiveness of
agri-food products, opinions are supported by the results of quantitative and qualitative research: A total of
1,200 consumers were interviewed. The survey was conducted by sending a questionnaire through digital
channels. 74% of consumers named quality as the main characteristic of competitiveness. The price comes only
in second and it is chosen by 21% of consumers. With increasing age and income, the importance of quality
increases. It was found out that service and packaging are not crucial for consumers in the process of selecting agri-food products. In addition, it should be noted, that for 42% of respondents are more or less impacted by
advertising for agri-food products. Thus, producers need to devote a large portion of their resources to quality
improvement, while the state should create a favorable environment for this.
Research has shown that in general, quality is the main factor for choosing one of two similar products.
Similarly, consumers' choice in purchasing agri-food products is largely determined by its quality and
subsequent personal experience. So, the Georgian consumer is in the transition stage of the 2nd and 3rd levels
of competitiveness Pyramid.
The analysis of customer responses categorized by age groups revealed an interesting result. In particular,
as the age of the buyer increases, quality plays a major role in the decision to purchase an agri-food product.
Consequently, price dependence decreases. In the age categories of 55-64 years old and 65 years old and over,
the price is replaced by taste characteristics and utility. When the answers were grouped based on average
monthly income, similar results were received, with the increase in income, quality becomes the main factor to
purchase the product. Price becomes relatively crucial for low-income respondents.
Consumers evaluate Georgian agro-food products as having average competitiveness. Thus, it is important
for manufacturers to focus on improving the quality of their products. However, competitiveness cannot be
achieved at the product level unless certain preconditions are created at the state level to ensure it.
The conducted research will give an opportunity to the interested persons to introduce the peculiarities of
product competitiveness in the agro-food market of Georgia and help them to determine the right production
strategy. Thus, the study contains few limitations, which should be solved in the future researches. Limitations
are following: the sample size was limited by 1200 respondents. More significant number of consumers can be
included into the study in the future. The online survey method was the only method used, which should be
further combined with field and experimental investigations.
Description
1. Abbott, P. C., & Bredahl, M. E. (1994). Competitiveness: Definitions, Useful Concepts, and Issues. In
Competitiveness in International Food Markets p. 25.. CRC Press.
2. Altukhov, A. I., Drokin, V. V., & Zhuravlev, A. S. (2019) Increasing competitiveness the agro-food complex
is impossible without its rational territorial organization. IOP conference series: earth and environmental
science. IOP Publishing, Vol. 274, No. 1.
3. Atkinson, R. D. (2013). Competitiveness, innovation and productivity: cleaning up the confusion. The
Information Technology & Innovation Foundation.
4. Bawakyillenuo, S., & Agbelie, I. S. (2021). Environmental Consciousness of Entrepreneurs in Ghana: How
Do Entrepreneur Types, Demographic Characteristics and Product Competitiveness Count? Sustainability,
13(16), 9139.
5. Bojnec, Š., & Fertő, I. (2015). Agri-Food Export Competitiveness in European Union Countries. Journal of
Common Market Studies JCMS., Volume 53, Issue 3, 476-492.
6. Borisov, P., Stoeva, T., & Dirimanova, V. (2021). Methodology for Assessing The Competitiveness of
Agricultural Enterprises. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and
Rural Development.
7. Burkynskyi, B., Alyokhin, A., Brutman, A., Sokolovska, Z., & Khumarova, N. (2019). Competitiveness and
Related Concepts: A Logical Approach to Definition. Икономически изследвания, Issue No: 4, 18-44.
8. Cho, D., & Moon, H. C. (2000). From Adam Smith To Michael Porter: Evolution Of Competitiveness Theory.
Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
9. Dima, I. C., Man, M., & Kot, S. (2010). Use of Abraham Maslow's motivation theory for setting consumers'
satisfaction-non-satisfaction. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 2, 132-138.
10. Dovgal, O. V., Kravchenko, M. V., Demchuk, N. I., Odnoshevnaya, O. A., Novikov, O. Y., Andrusiv, U. Y.,
Popadynets, I. R. (2017). Methods of competitiveness assessment of agricultural enterprise in eastern
Europe. Regional Science Inquiry, Vol. IX, 2., 231-242.
11. Gagnidze, I. (2012). Country Competitiveness and Clusters: History and Modernity. Universali. Tbilisi.
12. Gopinath, M., Arnade, C., Shane, M., & Roe, T. (1997). Agricultural competitiveness: The case of the
United States and major EU countries. Agricultural Economics, Volume 16, Issue 2, 99-109.
13. Hambrick, D. C. (2017). High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency
Approach. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4.
14. Krugman, P. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous Obsession. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 2.
15. Latruffe, L. (2010). Competitiveness, Productivity and Efficiency in the Agricultural and Agri-Food Sectors.
OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Working Papers, No. 30, OECD Publishing.
16. Liu, Z., Qin, C. X., & Zhang, Y. J. (2021). Mining product competitiveness by fusing multisource online
information. Decision Support Systems, 143, 113477.
17. Logodashki, N. (2020). Competitiveness And Competitive Strategies In Wine Production. Икономика и
управление, 17(2) 72-83.
18. Maslova, V., N. Zaruk, C. Fuchs, and M. Avdeev. (2019). Competitiveness of agricultural products in the
Eurasian Economic Union. Agriculture, 9(3) 61.
19. Masters, W. A., & Winter-Nelson, A. (1995). Measuring the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural
Activities: Domestic Resource Costs and the Social Cost-Benefit Ratio. American Journal of Agricultural
Economics, Volume 77, Issue 2, 243-250.
20. McLeod, S. (2007). Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Retrieved from
https://www.simplypsychology.org/maslow.html
21. Miller, D. (2017). Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and
Performance Implications. Academy of Management Journal Vol. 31, No. 2.
22. Nuryakin, N., & Maryati, T. (2020). Green product competitiveness and green product success. Why and
how does mediating affect green innovation performance? Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues,
7(4), 3061.
23. Ozerova, M. G., Sharopatova, A. V., & Olentsova, J. A. (2019). Improving the competitiveness of
agricultural products as a basis for solving import replacement issues. IOP Conference Series: Earth and
Environmental Science, Volume 315, Issue 2. IOP Publishing.
24. Papageorgiou, A., & Petropoulos, D. P. (2010). The competitiveness of agricultural products in domestic
and international markets 1981-2007. Sustainable agriculture and food production: adaptations to a
changing social, economic and institutional environment pp. 89-103.. Thessaloniki, Greece: Hellenic
Association of Agricultural Economists.
25. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New
York: The Free Press.
26. Rastorgouev, P.V. (2020). Methodological bases for assessing competitiveness of agri-food products
according to quality Parameters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. Agrarian
Series, 58(2) 164-175.
27. Savchenko, T., N. Basiurkina, O. Rodina, and A. Kwilinski. (2019). Improvement of the assessment
methods of product competitiveness of the specialized poultry enterprises. Management theory and
studies for rural business and infrastructure development, vol. 41, no. 1 43-61.
28. Sheldon, I. M. (2017). The Competitiveness of Agricultural Product and Input Markets: A Review and
Synthesis of Recent Research. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Volume 49 Issue 1, 1-44.
29. Shestakovska, T., Durglishvili, N., & Kushnir, S. (2018). Competitiveness of the agrarian business in the
context of maintenance of leadership positions on the market. International Conference on Social,
Economic and Academic Leadership ICSEAL. pp. 177-184. Advances in Social Science, Education and
Humanities Research, Vol. 217.
30. Talikadze N., Kharaishvili E. (2022). Competitiveness characteristics of agri-food products – what does the
consumer choose? (Case of Georgia). Innovative Marketing , 18(1), 195-207.
31. Wilson, S. (2018). Assessing export competitiveness of food manufacturers in SIDS. Competitiveness
Review, Vol. 28 No. 4 408-432.
32. Zakharchenko, O.V., O.O. Alieksieichuk, A. V. Kliuchnyk, N. Y. Shyriaieva, and I. V. Kudlai. (2020). State
support of agricultural producers as a factor in increasing the competitiveness of the agricultural sector.
Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(1) 687.
33. Zhu, X., Demeter, R. M., & Lansink, A. G. (2008). Competitiveness of dairy farms in three countries: the
role of CAP subsidies. International Congress. Ghent, Belgium: European Association of Agricultural
Economists EAAE.
Keywords
კონკურენტუნარიანობა, აგროსასურსათო პროდუქტი, მომხმარებელთა ქცევა, შესყიდვის ფაქტორები, მომხმარებლის პრეფერენციები
Citation
VII International Scientific Conference: "Challenges of Globalization in Economics and Business", Tbilisi, 2022, pp. 428-437