ქართული ლიტერატურის ქრონოლოგიზაციის საკითხისათვის – მწერლობა ორი ეპოქის ზღვარზე

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Date
2021-12-23
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობა
Abstract
In modern literary discussion is noticeable an ambiguity about principles of the division into periods. Every dispute of this subject begins with the verification of the fact ,that history of literature may be defined by different principles. Either, writers creative biography’s evaluating and analyses method should be subordinated under historical belonging, or to make a classification in accordance with essentials of creative works legacy. There is two ways to correct that mistake.1) to make a division into periods only by characterristic principle in accordance with different modulations. A) To definite by formal-directive belonging, for example: age of Renaissance, Romanticism, Modernism, Realism. B) or by outstanding writers of epoch, for example: the age of Ilia, Rustaveli, Baratashvili, Galaktion. But anyway there is some disparity between those principles of modulation. For example to which formal-directive module’s subordinating is GalaktionTabidze-Renaissance, Romanticism, Modernism, Realism. or he should be studied under all modules in accordance with his universalism? By the way also acts the principle of prioritization and opposition: for example, how to name 19th century’s 6080 years time –the age of Ilia Chavchavadze, Akaki Tsereteli, or VajaPshavela, or 19th century’s 2030 years timethe epoch of Galaktion Tabudze or Konstantine Gamsakhurdia?! Second principle is clear calendar definition: for example, 20th century’s Georgian writings begins in 1900 year. But still remains controversial many issues. And finally according with world’s literary I would underline, that in every existed reader-historical works is followed all principles of historical chronology, though characteristic difference is submitted with regularity. In conclusion, it is obvious, that literary-historical definition means attribute and chronological synthesis, limit, that literate must follow while making definition, because both components: chronology and attribute determinate the place of writer in literature’s history.
Description
Keywords
ლიტერატურა, პერიოდიზაცია, ეპოქა, ქრონოლოგია, მსოფლმხედველობა, ჟანრი, Literature, Periodization, Epoch, Chronology, Worldview, Genre
Citation
სამეცნიერო კონფერენცია „XIX საუკუნე – ეპოქათა მიჯნა“, თეზისები, თბილისი, 2021, გვ. 55-58 / Scientific Conference XIX CENTURY – THE BOUNDARY OF EPOCHS, ABSTRACTS, Tbilisi, 2021 pp. 55-58