ქართული ლიტერატურის ქრონოლოგიზაციის საკითხისათვის – მწერლობა ორი ეპოქის ზღვარზე

dc.contributor.authorპაიჭაძე, თამარ
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-24T07:43:58Z
dc.date.available2022-03-24T07:43:58Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-23
dc.description.abstractIn modern literary discussion is noticeable an ambiguity about principles of the division into periods. Every dispute of this subject begins with the verification of the fact ,that history of literature may be defined by different principles. Either, writers creative biography’s evaluating and analyses method should be subordinated under historical belonging, or to make a classification in accordance with essentials of creative works legacy. There is two ways to correct that mistake.1) to make a division into periods only by characterristic principle in accordance with different modulations. A) To definite by formal-directive belonging, for example: age of Renaissance, Romanticism, Modernism, Realism. B) or by outstanding writers of epoch, for example: the age of Ilia, Rustaveli, Baratashvili, Galaktion. But anyway there is some disparity between those principles of modulation. For example to which formal-directive module’s subordinating is GalaktionTabidze-Renaissance, Romanticism, Modernism, Realism. or he should be studied under all modules in accordance with his universalism? By the way also acts the principle of prioritization and opposition: for example, how to name 19th century’s 6080 years time –the age of Ilia Chavchavadze, Akaki Tsereteli, or VajaPshavela, or 19th century’s 2030 years timethe epoch of Galaktion Tabudze or Konstantine Gamsakhurdia?! Second principle is clear calendar definition: for example, 20th century’s Georgian writings begins in 1900 year. But still remains controversial many issues. And finally according with world’s literary I would underline, that in every existed reader-historical works is followed all principles of historical chronology, though characteristic difference is submitted with regularity. In conclusion, it is obvious, that literary-historical definition means attribute and chronological synthesis, limit, that literate must follow while making definition, because both components: chronology and attribute determinate the place of writer in literature’s history.en_US
dc.identifier.citationსამეცნიერო კონფერენცია „XIX საუკუნე – ეპოქათა მიჯნა“, თეზისები, თბილისი, 2021, გვ. 55-58 / Scientific Conference XIX CENTURY – THE BOUNDARY OF EPOCHS, ABSTRACTS, Tbilisi, 2021 pp. 55-58en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tsu.ge/handle/123456789/1327
dc.language.isogeen_US
dc.publisherივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტის გამომცემლობაen_US
dc.subjectლიტერატურაen_US
dc.subjectპერიოდიზაციაen_US
dc.subjectეპოქაen_US
dc.subjectქრონოლოგიაen_US
dc.subjectმსოფლმხედველობაen_US
dc.subjectჟანრიen_US
dc.subjectLiteratureen_US
dc.subjectPeriodizationen_US
dc.subjectEpochen_US
dc.subjectChronologyen_US
dc.subjectWorldviewen_US
dc.subjectGenreen_US
dc.titleქართული ლიტერატურის ქრონოლოგიზაციის საკითხისათვის – მწერლობა ორი ეპოქის ზღვარზეen_US
dc.title.alternativeFor the issue of chronology of Georgian literature Literature at the Edge of two epochsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
თეზისები - მე-19 საუკუნე 01.03._11.pdf
Size:
56.9 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: